Dear Friends,
The contempt notices were issued against former senator and general secretary of
the PPP's Sindh chapter, Taj Haider, and the party's provincial media
coordinator, Sharjeel Inam Memon, under Article 204 of the Constitution relating
to contempt of court and Section 3 of the Contempt of the Court Ordinance, 2003.
The notice asked Mr Memon also to explain to the court why he should not be
disqualified as member of the provincial assembly for alleged utterances against
the judiciary under the Constitution's Article 63(1g) relating to
disqualification for being convicted by a court or defaming or ridiculing the
judiciary, and Article 113 relating to qualification or disqualification for
assembly membership. Taking notice of the protest, the apex court wrote letters
to the Sindh assembly secretary asking for a copy of a resolution passed by the
provincial assembly condemning the ruling as well as to the Sindh chief
secretary, inspector general of police, head of the Intelligence Bureau for
Sindh and chairman of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, with a
direction to submit reports about measures taken by their respective offices to
control the law and order situation on that day.
According to judicial dictators, "In a reaction to the Supreme Court verdict of
declaring the appointment of Justice (Retired) Deedar Hussain Shah as chairman
of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) illegal, the PPP's Sindh chapter had
called for a strike that halted commercial and business activities in Karachi
and other parts of the province and seven people lost their lives in different
incidents of violence" The two PPP leaders will not be the first to face
contempt of court charges since a similar contempt proceeding is also pending
against Interior Minister Rehman Malik, Mr. Qamar Zaman Qaira and Mr,.Syed
Khursheed Shah. Enjoying the complete support of people of Sindh , The MPAs
also came out from the Sindh Assembly building to the Sindh High Court to lodge
a protest against "politically-motivated decisions of the superior judiciary"
and against "interference of the judiciary in administrative affairs". They
rightly were asking that why the judgment are found discriminatory since death
sentence of Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto? And that why another person from Sindh
is sacked from the office just because he is Sindhi and belong to Sindh? The
judicial dictators are found keeping the dual standards since 1979 intact as
they did not take any action against those who invaded the courts, which was a
reference to the Nov 28, 1997, storming of the Supreme Court by PML-N
supporters. Didn't even take notices for those who did the massacre of about 55
innocents who had come to say welcome to deposed and now present CJ Mr. Iftikhar
Chodhry on 12 May 2007. Victim families are wandering for justice but PPP-P and
Sindh.is on fire and on judicial harrying.
People of Sindh suggest judicial dictators that would have been better if:
· The families of missing persons, in which security agencies may have
been involved, be given relief.
· The suo-moto may haven taken in the massacre of 12 May 2007 and the
may have been taken justice even after 3 years of reinstatement of present Chief
Judicial Dictator of Pakistan.
· If the suo-motto to probe into the R.Davis Fleem a public demand,
have been taken.
--
Muhammad Abbas Bhutto
Worker PPPP & P.Agent N.A-207
Larkana (03139200340)
I. If you want to receive individual emails
II. Receive one mail with all activity in it
III. Do not want to receive any mail at all
Regards,
Tariq Khattak, Group Manager,
GSM = 0300-9599007 and 0333-9599007
+92-300-9599007 and +92-333-9599007
Tariqgulkhattak@gmail.com
Tariqgulkhattak@hotmail.com
REQUESTS:
1)Please directly contact sender for personal/individual correspondence.
2)Try to discuss issues that will catch attention of many readers.
3)Please avoid sending messages in any language other than English
4)Avoid sending messages addressed to many recipients.
5)Do not send messages aimed at personal publicity.
6)Please do not send personal/other links unless necessary.
7)The Group is not obliged to publish printed news,
very short/long comments and objectionable material.
8)Every mail cannot be published; it will overload Mailboxes
of our valued members.
9)Try to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable, Unsympathetic and/or Unpleasant.
x==x==x==x==x==x
Please note that,
It is a common platform for journalists and all others who are interested in knowing about the issues that are sometimes not reported. This group favours philosophy of progress, reform and the protection of civil liberties. Please share and educate others. The owners and managers of this site do not necessarily agree with any of the information. It is an open forum; everyone is allowed to share anything. Mails sent by members and non-members are subject to approval. However, we are not responsible in any way for the contents of mails / opinion sent by members. We do not guarantee that the information will be completely accurate. (Nor can print and electronic media). If you find content on this site which you feel is inappropriate or inaccurate, incomplete, or useless you are most welcome to report it or contradict it.
Thanks a lot.
