Poverty does not breed extremism in Pakistan, study finds
Spending millions of pounds on development in Pakistan will do nothing to
keep young men out of the clutches of the Taliban, according to an extensive
survey of Pakistani attitudes towards extremism which will deepen the row
over Britain's aid budget.
Studies suggest poorer Pakistanis were actually less likely to support
extremist groups than more affluent, better educated people Photo: AFP
(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/rob-crilly/)
By _Rob Crilly_ (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/rob-crilly/) ,
Islamabad
4:23PM BST 20 May 2011
The study, conducted by researchers from prestigious American universities,
found no link between poverty and support for militant groups.
The findings undermine a central pillar of the Conservative government's
radical new policy on aid, which will deliver almost £1.4bn to _Pakistan_
(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/) over the next five
years as part of a strategy to protect Britain from terrorist attack.
On Wednesday, Theresa May, the Home Secretary, spelled out the policy to a
jeering audience of police officers, who face pay cuts while extra cash is
earmarked for Pakistan.
"If you get aid right in certain parts of the world, such as Pakistan, it
will reduce the possibility of terrorism on the streets of the UK," she
said.
Christine Fair, a South Asia expert at Georgetown University and one of the
authors of the new paper, said there was no evidence for such sweeping
assertions and that her study of 6,000 people suggested that poorer Pakistanis
were actually less likely to support extremist groups than more affluent,
better educated people.
"The terrorism literature has long held that poverty does not explain
terrorism," she told The Daily Telegraph.
"Yet despite what would be a fairly robust body of literature, both the
British government and the American government, have put together this canard
that we can buy our way out of terrorism by investing in education and so
forth. We simply don't find this."
Andrew Mitchell, who became International Development Secretary last year,
has repeatedly talked of putting national security at the heart of aid
policy.
With domestic budgets being cut, the argument has been deployed to justify
continuing to spend money overseas – even in Pakistan, a middle income
country where few people pay tax and the government spends more than £4bn on
its Army and nuclear arsenal each year.
In March, a review of British overseas declared, "Tackling extreme poverty
in Pakistan will help make the UK safer," as ministers announced they would
more than double the amount of cash for the terrorist-hit country – to
£446m in 2015, so long as certain benchmarks are met.
However, development agencies such as Oxfam have warned that such moves are
wrongheaded and that money should be spent purely to help those in need –
not to protect Britain.
The new research, the first of its kind and published by the Social Science
Research Network, suggests the money will not even help make Britain more
secure.
In an "endorsement experiment", respondents were asked how much they
supported different policies – the use of peace jirgas or reform of school
curricula for example.
A test group was told the policies were connected with Kashmiri terror
groups or the Afghan Taliban.
The difference between their responses and those of a control group, which
was not told of any connection, was taken as a measure of support for the
militant groups.
When compared with socio-economic indicators, the researchers found poorer
people were less likely to support extremist politics.
The paper concluded that poorer people in Pakistan were more likely to be
the victims of suicide bombings and other terror attacks, and therefore were
more likely to have negative feelings towards militants.
"This does mean there aren't good reasons to invest in education and
poverty mitigation. There are perfectly good reasons to do that. But if you are
doing it with the explicit goal of buying security at home, there is not a
lot of evidence," said Dr Fair.
"None at all."
Andrew Mitchell, International Development Secretary, insisted that
countries lacking education and mired in poverty were the least stable.
"Improving governance, security and the rule of law, matched with better
opportunities in terms of education and jobs, means we are lifting people out
of extreme poverty and addressing grievances that can lead people towards
extremism," he said.
"It is too narrow to consider this issue simply in terms of financial
poverty and extremism. It is vital to consider a wider range of issues that can
lead to instability and extremism, including local grievances and poor
education."
Source :
_http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8526473/Poverty-does-not-breed-extremism-in-Pakistan-study-finds.html_
(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8526473/Poverty-does-not-breed-ext
remism-in-Pakistan-study-finds.html)
I. If you want to receive individual emails
II. Receive one mail with all activity in it
III. Do not want to receive any mail at all
Regards,
Tariq Khattak, Group Manager,
GSM = 0300-9599007 and 0333-9599007
+92-300-9599007 and +92-333-9599007
Tariqgulkhattak@gmail.com
Tariqgulkhattak@hotmail.com
REQUESTS:
1)Please directly contact sender for personal/individual correspondence.
2)Try to discuss issues that will catch attention of many readers.
3)Please avoid sending messages in any language other than English
4)Avoid sending messages addressed to many recipients.
5)Do not send messages aimed at personal publicity.
6)Please do not send personal/other links unless necessary.
7)The Group is not obliged to publish printed news,
very short/long comments and objectionable material.
8)Every mail cannot be published; it will overload Mailboxes
of our valued members.
9)Try to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable, Unsympathetic and/or Unpleasant.
x==x==x==x==x==x
Please note that,
It is a common platform for journalists and all others who are interested in knowing about the issues that are sometimes not reported. This group favours philosophy of progress, reform and the protection of civil liberties. Please share and educate others. The owners and managers of this site do not necessarily agree with any of the information. It is an open forum; everyone is allowed to share anything. Mails sent by members and non-members are subject to approval. However, we are not responsible in any way for the contents of mails / opinion sent by members. We do not guarantee that the information will be completely accurate. (Nor can print and electronic media). If you find content on this site which you feel is inappropriate or inaccurate, incomplete, or useless you are most welcome to report it or contradict it.
Thanks a lot.
