Journalist.
Office# 00673-222-5293
Mobile# 0060163264403
Tariq Khattak.
0300-9599007 and 0333-9599007
Tariqgulkhattak@gmail.com
Sent: 6/29/2012 10:16:35 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: Fwd: Corruption of Najam Sethi Exposed by a Pakistani Student in New York
Corruption of Najam Sethi Exposed by a Pakistani Student in New York
Posted by: "Abu Hamdan" rubeel@gmail.com rubeel
Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:34 am (PDT)
Press Release
KCEU Host India UPR 2012 - A Kashmir Perspective
at the United Nations in Geneva
Thursday, 28 June 2012 - ICHR Kashmir Centre.EU, in association with IHRAAM, today hosted a side event at the 20th session of the Human Rights Council entitled India UPR 2012 - A Kashmir Perspective.
Barrister A. Majid Tramboo opened by outlining the current position of the Indian UPR and discussed the 169 recommendations that were submitted to India by the Human Rights Council regarding its second UPR.
He noted that there were numerous recommendations to repeal the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, Ratify the Convention Against Torture and the Convention for the Protection of All Persons From Disappearance along with their optional protocols, to abolish the death penalty, to end immunity for the armed forces, to better train the police in their human rights obligations and to repeal other draconian laws.
Tramboo gave prominence to the statements made by the United States, Norway, Belgium and the United Kingdom which were very critical of the aforementioned human rights abuses carried out by India.
However, he noted, states failed in their obligation to raise the issue of mass graves in Kashmir; the first of which were discovered in mid 2008. He offered his commitment to continue to pursue the issue with the Human Rights Council and to persist in advocacy to have it raised in the current UPR of India.
On the mass graves Mr. Tramboo called it one of the most disturbing human rights violations of modern times. He said that it was unfortunate to see that the Indian Government had not taken heed of the 2008 European Parliament Urgency Resolution on Mass Graves in Kashmir. He further noted that while the mass graves issue has only marginally made it onto the agenda of the Human Rights Council the Kashmiri diaspora will continue to lobby for justice at the highest levels with both states and the mechanisms of the Office of the HIgh Commissioner for Human Rights.
Prof. Alfred de Zayas Said that aiming and shaming has an impact, that is the point of the UPR process. He said that civil society should continue to lobby hard on the UPR of states that commit human rights abuses as it was a very visible mechanism by which to attempt to force change.
Dr. Karen Parker argued that Kashmir should not come under the remit of the India UPR as Kashmir does not belong to India. Had the UN resolutions been implemented and the people have Kashmir had chosen to a part of India then this would be a different matter.
Furthermore, Dr. Parker said that due to the situation in Kashmir being an occupation all cases of serious human rights abuse should be treated as a war crime but this was not the case.
Discussing self-determination Dr. Parker said that five criteria must be met in order for a people to be able to claim their right to self-determination. Those are an identifiable land, a distinguishing element such as language or culture, a history of self-governance, the will to exercise the right to self-determination and the capacity to govern. She said that Kashmir undoubtedly met all of the relevant criteria.
Prof. Krishna Ahoojapatel noted that the number of recommendations was very high for India in its second cycle of UPR and many of them focussed on serious human rights abuses such as disappearance, torture, immunity as little progress had been made on these matters.
Prof. Ahoojapatel further discussed the rights of women and the rights of children noting that India is making no progress or very little progress in improving the conditions as recommended in the first round of UPR.
Prof Nazir Shawl focussed on the points of disappearance, the AFSPA, and torture. On disappearance he once again called upon the Government of India to first sign the Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Disappearance and also to investigate the mass graves in order to ascertain if the bodies there can be reunited with their families as is proper. He noted a number of cases, particularly the Pathribal case, in which the Indian military and para-military forces had recevied immunity for murder, torture and all other manner of human rights abuses.
Altaf Hussain Wani described the Kashmir conflict as the longest running case of severe human rights abuse in the world. He said that the 700,000 Indian troops stationed in Kashmir amount to almost one soldier for every ten citizens. Calling upon the international community and the offices of the OHCHR to increase pressure on the Government of India to put an end to the cycle of violence he offered his hope that the people of Indian Held Kashmir would not have to suffer for very much longer.
Mr. Ronald Barnes outlined the principles of self-determination as laid out in the UN Charter and numerous other international treaties. Relating it to the issue of Kashmir he said that it was of grave concern that the issue of self-determination had not been raised by a single state with reference to Kashmir.
Concluding the interactive dialogue Mr. Tramboo thanked the panelists and audience and assured all of them that the suggestions and ideas floated in the debate would be strategised and eventually advocated before the member states of UNHRC.
KCEU has also been hosting a week long exhibition outside the United Nations to raise awareness of the human rights tragedy in Kashmir.
| ||||||||||
Dearest Beloved, My name is Mrs. Doris Sambou, I was a nurse and an elder in the Church. I was married to the Late Sir Gerald White Sambou who worked with the Burkina Faso Coton Company here Burkina Faso for over a decade before he died on 5th of July in the year 2007. Recently, my Doctor told me that I would not last for the next 4 months due to a rare form of cancer of the pancreas. Though what disturbs me most is my stroke, I have no one to inherit my late husband's estate. Please accept to stand as the beneficiary to my late husband funds and receive his estate, When my late husband was alive he kept USD$5,000.000.00 (Five Million United State Dollars) with one of the bank here in Burkina Faso. Presently, this funds is still with the bank. the money will be transferred to your personal bank account in your state city as soon as I am convince that you will help me with all your heart. my private lawyer will prepare all the required Legal documents to your name. The money is meant for the project for the less privileged and down trodden in our society and also donate it to the recent earthquake crises that happened in Japan. So do not be afraid of anything. One last thing my dearest, please use this money for its purpose as it is my late husband's dying wish and also 'God's plan'... I will be very glad to hear from you. Thank you and God bless you. Mrs Doris Sambou. My E-mail address (mrsdorissambou44@gmail.com) |
.
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th & 6th Nuclear Countries Are Thinking About How To Do Advancements In Space & How To Make A Permanent Station On Moon.
.
&
The 7th Nuclear Power Is Debating On
.
"Load Shedding",
.
"New Provinces",
.
"Ramzan Ka Chand",
.
"Polio Ke Qatry Halal Ya Haram?"
.
"Iodine Mila Namak Aur Baanjh Pan?"
.
"Chief Justice Hero Ya Zero?"
.
"Nokia Ya IPad?"
.
"Cheapest Calling & SMS Packages"
.
"Veena Malik",
"Rehman Malik",
"Riaz Malik"
.
"Tuk Tuk Misbah",
"Zubaida Aapa",
"Faraz"
WHAT A CONTRAST
Pakistan Zinda Baad...
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
(REVENUE DIVISION)
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE
*********
PRESS RELEASE
FBR issues SRO 774(I)/2012: further eases conditions for waiver of default surcharge and penalties on account of illegally adjusted input sales tax
Islamabad the 27th June, 2012
Federal Board of Revenue has taken yet another step to further facilitate tax payers. Today, SRO 774(I)/2012 dated 27.06.2012 is issued which supersedes the earlier SRO 606(I)/2012 dated 01.06.2012 which exempted the default surcharge and penalties on outstanding Sales Tax on account of illegally adjusted input tax. The condition for this earlier exemption was that the full principal amount (illegally adjusted) is paid by 30th June, 2012. The new SRO 774 further eases requirements for compliance.
According to the new SRO 774, default surcharge and penalties payable on outstanding illegally adjusted input tax shall be exempt if the tax payer pays twenty-five percent of the principal amount of illegally adjusted Sales tax by 30th June, 2012. The remaining seventy-five percent of the principal amount is to be paid in five equal monthly installments by 31st December, 2012 with the first installment payable on 31st August, 2012.
The condition of withdrawal of cases, complaints or proceedings filed by the tax payer before courts of law, FTO or any other authority has also been extended to 31st December, 2012. According to the new SRO the benefit so provided shall cease to exist ab initio in case of failure of payment in the government exchequer as per the conditions laid down in the SRO. The SRO is also available at FBR website www.fbr.gov.pk.
(Riffat Shaheen Qazi)
Official Spokesperson, FBR