The $110 Billion Question
When one looks across the Arab world today at the stunning spontaneous
democracy uprisings, it is impossible to not ask: What are we doing spending
$110 billion this year supporting corrupt and unpopular regimes in
Afghanistan and Pakistan that are almost identical to the governments we're
applauding the Arab people for overthrowing?
Ever since 9/11, the West has hoped for a war of ideas within the Muslim
world that would feature an internal challenge to the violent radical Islamic
ideology of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda. That contest, though, never
really materialized because the regimes we counted on to promote it found
violent Muslim extremism a convenient foil, so they allowed it to persist.
Moreover, these corrupt, crony capitalist Arab regimes were hardly the ideal
carriers for an alternative to bin Ladenism. To the contrary, it was their
abusive behavior and vicious suffocation of any kind of independent moderate
centrist parties that fueled the extremism even more.
Now the people themselves have taken down those regimes in Egypt and
Tunisia, and they're rattling the ones in Libya, Yemen, Bahrain, Oman and Iran.
They are not doing it for us, or to answer bin Laden. They are doing it by
themselves for themselves — because they want their freedom and to control
their own destinies. But in doing so they have created a hugely powerful,
modernizing challenge to bin Ladenism, which is why Al Qaeda today is
tongue-tied. It's a beautiful thing to watch.
Al Qaeda's answer to modern-day autocracy was its version of the
seventh-century Caliphate. But the people — from Tunisia to Yemen — have come up
with their own answer to violent extremism and the abusive regimes we've been
propping up. It's called democracy. They have a long way to go to lock it
in. It may yet be hijacked by religious forces. But, for now, it is clear
that the majority wants to build a future in the 21st century, not the
seventh.
In other words, the Arab peoples have done for free, on their own and for
their own reasons, everything that we were paying their regimes to do in the
"war on terrorism" but they never did.
And that brings me back to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Last October,
Transparency International rated the regime of President Hamid Karzai in
Afghanistan as the second most corrupt in the world after Somalia's. That is the
Afghan regime we will spend more than $110 billion in 2011 to support.
And tell me that Pakistan's intelligence service, ISI, which dominates
Pakistani politics, isn't the twin of Hosni Mubarak's security service.
Pakistan's military leaders play the same game Mubarak played with us for years.
First, they whisper in our ears: "Psst, without us, the radical Islamists
will rule. So we may not be perfect, but we're the only thing standing in
the way of the devil." In reality, though, they are nurturing the devil. The
ISI is long alleged to have been fostering anti-Indian radical Muslim
groups and masterminding the Afghan Taliban.
Apart from radical Islam, the other pretext the Pakistani military uses for
its inordinate grip on power is the external enemy. Just as Arab regimes
used the conflict with Israel for years to keep their people distracted and
to justify huge military budgets, Pakistan's ISI tells itself, the
Pakistani people and us that it can't stop sponsoring proxies in Afghanistan
because of the "threat" from India.
Here's a secret: India is not going to invade Pakistan. It is an utterly
bogus argument. India wants to focus on its own development, not owning
Pakistan's problems. India has the second-largest Muslim population on the
planet, more even than Pakistan. And while Indian Muslims are not without their
economic and political grievances, they are, on the whole, integrated into
India's democracy because it is a democracy. There are no Indian Muslims in
Guantánamo Bay.
Finally, you did not need to dig very far in Egypt or Jordan to hear that
one reason for the rebellion in Egypt and protests in Jordan was the
in-your-face corruption and crony capitalism that everyone in the public knew
about.
That same kind of pillaging of assets — natural resources, development aid,
the meager savings of a million Kabul Bank depositors and crony contracts —
has fueled a similar anger against the regime in Afghanistan and u
ndermined our nation-building efforts there.
The truth is we can't do much to consolidate the democracy movements in
Egypt and Tunisia. They'll have to make it work themselves. But we could do
what we can, which is divert some of the $110 billion we're lavishing on the
Afghan regime and the Pakistani Army and use it for debt relief, schools
and scholarships to U.S. universities for young Egyptians and Tunisians who
had the courage to take down the very kind of regimes we're still holding up
in Kabul and Islamabad.
I know we can't just walk out of Afghanistan and Pakistan; there are good
people, too, in both places. But our involvement in these two countries —
150,000 troops to confront Al Qaeda — is totally out of proportion today with
our interests and out of all sync with our values. ,
I. If you want to receive individual emails
II. Receive one mail with all activity in it
III. Do not want to receive any mail at all
Regards,
Tariq Khattak, Group Manager,
GSM = 0300-9599007 and 0333-9599007
+92-300-9599007 and +92-333-9599007
Tariqgulkhattak@gmail.com
Tariqgulkhattak@hotmail.com
REQUESTS:
1)Please directly contact sender for personal/individual correspondence.
2)Try to discuss issues that will catch attention of many readers.
3)Please avoid sending messages in any language other than English
4)Avoid sending messages addressed to many recipients.
5)Do not send messages aimed at personal publicity.
6)Please do not send personal/other links unless necessary.
7)The Group is not obliged to publish printed news,
very short/long comments and objectionable material.
8)Every mail cannot be published; it will overload Mailboxes
of our valued members.
9)Try to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable, Unsympathetic and/or Unpleasant.
x==x==x==x==x==x
Please note that,
It is a common platform for journalists and all others who are interested in knowing about the issues that are sometimes not reported. This group favours philosophy of progress, reform and the protection of civil liberties. Please share and educate others. The owners and managers of this site do not necessarily agree with any of the information. It is an open forum; everyone is allowed to share anything. Mails sent by members and non-members are subject to approval. However, we are not responsible in any way for the contents of mails / opinion sent by members. We do not guarantee that the information will be completely accurate. (Nor can print and electronic media). If you find content on this site which you feel is inappropriate or inaccurate, incomplete, or useless you are most welcome to report it or contradict it.
Thanks a lot.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Gujranwalafun@Aol.com
Gujranwala@windiowslive.com