[Pak-Media] Who killed Saleem Shezad?

Saleem in the shadow of Massoud

By Chan Akya

(The following piece was written by a colleague of Saleem Shehzad and published in Asia Times Online. The author has pointed the accusing finger at the ISI. His theory is that Pakistan Navy and Al-Qaeda were planning a WMD attack on Israel and Saleem Shehzad had found that. This is the most absurd and ludicrous theory ever invented which raises doubt over the role and purpose of this Internet newspaper. It has been well known in journalist circles that the next false flag operation would involve stolen uranium for which Al-Qaeda would be blamed and uranium would be reported to be obtained from Pakistan. Saleem Shehzad found that Al-Qaeda had infiltrated the Pakistan Navy and he published that fact in the last story he filed. In this article by Chan Akya he suggests that it was not infiltration but collusion, which is ridiculous. The attack on Mehran Naval Base could not be to obtain the release of Al-Qaeda infiltrators. Holding hostages is often the way to achieve that purpose. The attack on Mehran Base was a clandestine operation by RAW as indicted by the target chosen and employment of Russian mercenaries. It may be remembered that RAW employed Russian mercenaries for the slaughter of BDR officer on 25-26 February 2009 which included Major General Shakil and four brigadiers – a total of 59 officers. RAW has access to mercenary groups of East European origin. One of those captured alive in Karachi is Indian and three Russian with Muslim names. Saleem Shehzad was close to discovering the truth that RAW was planning a clandestine operation in India to be blamed on Al-Qaeda with radioactive material coming from Karachi. RAW assassinated Saleem Shehzad to keep him from revealing that RAW had carried out the attack on Mehran Naval Air Station. Following the simple rule – who benefits- it is obvious RAW did him in. Revealing that the Pakistan Navy was infiltrated by Al-Qaeda did no damage to the reputation of the ISI. + Usman Khalid+)

To call the killing of Syed Saleem Shahzad a grave injustice would itself do grave injustice to all that he stood for. In a country characterized by all forms of corruption, from the mundane economic crimes of politicians to the self-serving institutions of the military (the Inter-Services Intelligence - ISI - being a state within a state) and worst of all the selfish corruption of the country's population (the silent majority is never as quiet), Saleem, Asia Times Online's Pakistan bureau chief, stood out as that rarest of commodities - a person who believed in what he did, and more importantly, did what he believed in.

His was the most unique form of courage - that of a lonely man surrounded by cowardly or corrupt people. It is a different breed of courage than what the likes of al-Qaeda muster, when they get impressionable young men to join a large mob that targets weak and innocent people.

Saleem's killing raises the question - why? What was the need to kidnap, torture and kill the man? His recent articles have increasingly exposed the connections between al-Qaeda and the ISI, and more importantly those between al-Qaeda and the Pakistan navy. Specifically, he stumbled upon the casus belli for last month's attacks on Karachi naval installations by al-Qaeda, namely the arrests of various navy personnel due to their proximity to al-Qaeda.

Massoud may offer cluesTwo days before the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, al-Qaeda carried out the assassination of Ahmad Shah Massoud, the Lion of Panjshir and leader of the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance. The killing was widely reported as a putative gift by al-Qaeda to the Taliban that had been entrenched in a long-term warfare with Massoud and his men for control of Kabul and the northern provinces of Afghanistan. The two assassins posed as journalists, who went for an interview with the Lion. At the time, and since then, the hand of the ISI was widely suspected in the killing of Massoud.

Since then, a number of instances of such gifts made in the blood of innocents have occurred that have been followed by acts of terrorism. The killing of former Pakistani premier Benazir Bhutto in December 2007 springs to mind as the act of the Taliban to keep itself in the good books of the ISI and the Pakistan military - or a blood gift for all assistance previously rendered by these organizations that faced awkward questions if she had been elected back to power. The question uppermost in my mind is whether the shadow of Massoud lurks over the killing of Saleem as well.

Let us look at the evidence - we know that Saleem was focused on the links between al-Qaeda and the Pakistan navy. (See Al-Qaeda had warned of Pakistan strike Asia Times Online, May 27.) We also know that an offshoot of the Lashkar e-Taiba (LeT) attacked the Indian city of Mumbai in November 2008 to much "acclaim" in the Pakistani terror establishment. Saleem had interviewed Ilyas Kashmiri previously for Asia Times Online - and Kashmiri's 313 Brigade has been identified as the operational group behind the Karachi attacks in May.

So what if the Pakistan navy and Ilyas Kashmiri were in cahoots and a journalist found out? The current head of the Pakistan military, Ashfaq Parvez Kiani, was previously the head of the ISI - the organization that is accused of sheltering Osama bin Laden in Abbotabad. Therefore, the existence of links between the two (al-Qaeda and navy) wouldn't come as a surprise to anyone.

Unless, if the revelations were "inconvenient" to anyone on an operational basis. Massoud was an inconvenience to the Taliban in their ability to give shelter to al-Qaeda (which Bin Laden shrewdly realized would be needed after attacking the US); he was hence removed. Similarly, it may well be that Saleem was removed because his revelations were complicating certain operations.

What could those operations be? Firstly, it could involve an al-Qaeda operation against India. While traditionally the forces of al-Qaeda have kept away from India and subcontracted such "low" work to Pakistani terrorists, the apparent elevation of Ilyas Kashmiri within al-Qaeda may have changed that equation so that al-Qaeda would be focused on attacking India.

This theory though doesn't quite hold water because a lesser organization like LeT had already attacked India in November 2008. The objective of terror organizations is to do something "new and improved" like the ads for soaps. Hence, it is highly unlikely that whatever Saleem was in danger of stumbling on had anything to do with India.

If you remove the obvious alternatives, whatever remains must be the logical option. That would involve Israel - in other words, elements of the Pakistan navy may have been cooperating with al-Qaeda over a possible attack on Israel. The modus operandi would be similar to the attacks on India in November 2008 - sea-based, which is actively ignored by the Pakistan navy.

However, a commando-type operation like the one on India wouldn't be practical in the case of Israel. Secondly, there are a number of other navies between the shores of Pakistan and Israel, not the least of which would be the Americans. Thus, the plan is likely to have focused on what al-Qaeda wanted to remove from Pakistan that could be used later against Israel.

Remember, though, that the attacks on the Karachi naval installations were focused on the P3 Orion aircraft - exactly the technology that the navy would be using to monitor the movements of large craft of the type that is used to load/unload/transport large objects.

Adding up the different permutations, it is difficult to ignore the probability that the idea involves using weapons of mass destruction (WMD) that had been spirited away by al-Qaeda with the active connivance of elements in the ISI. America and other countries have been focusing on the worst-case scenario of al-Qaeda getting WMDs, but haven't spent enough time considering that the organization may already have done so.

Pakistan has been on a bit of a bomb-building spree recently - again a suspicious activity because the stockpile of nuclear weapons meant to target India was widely considered sufficient as recently as 2008. So the building of new bombs had to have something to do with other applications - or other enemies than India. It is also more plausible to hide the creation of a rogue nuclear weapon when a hundred ones are being built as against when the stockpile is stable.

If you were the ISI person responsible for this project, a mere journalist like Saleem would be quite an inconvenience for your partners. Tragic as the killing of Saleem is, it may well have been initiated as part of a blueprint for a WMD to be used on Israel by al-Qaeda. An attack on India using such WMD is also plausible, albeit less likely due to the immediate retaliation that would cause. ++

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

New Members 18

Visit Your Group

Thanks for participating. Kindly suggest improvements. Please let us know:
I.      If you want to receive individual emails
II.      Receive one mail with all activity in it
III.      Do not want to receive any mail at all

Regards,
Tariq Khattak, Group Manager,

GSM = 0300-9599007 and 0333-9599007
+92-300-9599007 and +92-333-9599007

Tariqgulkhattak@gmail.com
Tariqgulkhattak@hotmail.com

REQUESTS:
1)Please directly contact sender for personal/individual correspondence.
2)Try to discuss issues that will catch attention of many readers.
3)Please avoid sending messages in any language other than English
4)Avoid sending messages addressed to many recipients.
5)Do not send messages aimed at personal publicity.
6)Please do not send personal/other links unless necessary.
7)The Group is not obliged to publish printed news,
very short/long comments and objectionable material.
8)Every mail cannot be published; it will overload Mailboxes
of our valued members.
9)Try to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable, Unsympathetic and/or Unpleasant.

x==x==x==x==x==x

Please note that,
It is a common platform for journalists and all others who are interested in knowing about the issues that are sometimes not reported. This group favours philosophy of progress, reform and the protection of civil liberties. Please share and educate others. The owners and managers of this site do not necessarily agree with any of the information. It is an open forum; everyone is allowed to share anything. Mails sent by members and non-members are subject to approval. However, we are not responsible in any way for the contents of mails / opinion sent by members. We do not guarantee that the information will be completely accurate. (Nor can print and electronic media). If you find content on this site which you feel is inappropriate or inaccurate, incomplete, or useless you are most welcome to report it or contradict it.
Thanks a lot.