Dear all
The top members of the Bar and Bench have repeatedly confessed in media that true justice and independence has not trickled down from higher judiciary to the lower following lawyers movement. Pressure tactics of various kind are routinely seen in decision making blemishing the image of judiciary at that level. In other words, justice is still limping in the same way as it did before March 13, 2007-the day lawyer's movement took the first step for reformation. The Raymond Davies case brought up two important points to surface;
-
It confirmed that lower judiciary still works under pressure-political or otherwise. The session judge of the lower court would not have gone on sudden leave after pronouncing the judgement had he been independent in his decision.
-
The higher judiciary may not be as independent as we are given the impression. Reason?. Why LHC transferred a very high profile and legally complex case of Raymond Davies to the lower court knowing fully well that lower judiciary has not yet reformed to the standards as the high judiciary. Will it be fare to say that the higher judiciary passed the buck of responsibility to the lower judiciary for the reasons the lower judiciary is allegedly accused of?
Dr Ghayur Ayub
I. If you want to receive individual emails
II. Receive one mail with all activity in it
III. Do not want to receive any mail at all
Regards,
Tariq Khattak, Group Manager,
GSM = 0300-9599007 and 0333-9599007
+92-300-9599007 and +92-333-9599007
Tariqgulkhattak@gmail.com
Tariqgulkhattak@hotmail.com
REQUESTS:
1)Please directly contact sender for personal/individual correspondence.
2)Try to discuss issues that will catch attention of many readers.
3)Please avoid sending messages in any language other than English
4)Avoid sending messages addressed to many recipients.
5)Do not send messages aimed at personal publicity.
6)Please do not send personal/other links unless necessary.
7)The Group is not obliged to publish printed news,
very short/long comments and objectionable material.
8)Every mail cannot be published; it will overload Mailboxes
of our valued members.
9)Try to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable, Unsympathetic and/or Unpleasant.
x==x==x==x==x==x
Please note that,
It is a common platform for journalists and all others who are interested in knowing about the issues that are sometimes not reported. This group favours philosophy of progress, reform and the protection of civil liberties. Please share and educate others. The owners and managers of this site do not necessarily agree with any of the information. It is an open forum; everyone is allowed to share anything. Mails sent by members and non-members are subject to approval. However, we are not responsible in any way for the contents of mails / opinion sent by members. We do not guarantee that the information will be completely accurate. (Nor can print and electronic media). If you find content on this site which you feel is inappropriate or inaccurate, incomplete, or useless you are most welcome to report it or contradict it.
Thanks a lot.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Gujranwalafun@Aol.com
Gujranwala@windiowslive.com